This message generated a parse failure. Raw output follows here. Please use 'back' to navigate. From devnull@lkml.org Sat Apr 20 12:06:07 2024 Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:25:04 +0000 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752525AbXHFQYh (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:24:37 -0400 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.10.15]:60329 "EHLO pat.uio.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752580AbXHFQYg (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:24:36 -0400 Received: from mail-mx1.uio.no ([129.240.10.29]) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1II5NM-0001Dh-Hc; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:24:12 +0200 Received: from smtp.uio.no ([129.240.10.9] helo=mail-mx1.uio.no) by mail-mx1.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1II5NL-0006Ob-Sy; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:24:12 +0200 Received: from c-69-242-210-120.hsd1.mi.comcast.net ([69.242.210.120] helo=[192.168.0.101]) by mail-mx1.uio.no with esmtpsa (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1II5NL-0006OJ-8F; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:24:11 +0200 Subject: Re: [NFS] 2.6.23-rc1-mm2 From: Trond Myklebust To: Marc Dietrich Cc: Johannes Berg , Oleg Nesterov , Andrew Morton , Neil Brown , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra References: <20070731230932.a9459617.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070803172137.GA3783@tv-sign.ru> <1186381496.21957.30.camel@johannes.berg> <200708061305.37208.marc.dietrich@ap.physik.uni-giessen.de> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-uAbj9Yeafew4w7bjZykd" Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:24:05 -0400 Message-Id: <1186417445.6616.23.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 X-UiO-Resend: resent X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-0.1, required=12.0, autolearn=disabled, AWL=-0.069) X-UiO-Scanned: 51074D9CA0EBBBFB3101FACFE7EFF71DB25E27B7 X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 129.240.10.9 spam_score: 0 maxlevel 200 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 310 total 3120217 max/h 8345 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-uAbj9Yeafew4w7bjZykd Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 13:05 +0200, Marc Dietrich wrote: > Hi, > > Am Monday 06 August 2007 08:24 schrieb Johannes Berg: > > On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 21:21 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > To avoid a possible confusion: it is still OK if work->func() flushes > > > its own workqueue, so strictly speaking this trace is false positive, > > > but it would be very nice if we can get rid of this practice. > > > > I just had a thought: we could get rid of this warning by using a > > read-lock here. That way, flushing from within a work function (which > > would be seen as read-after-read recursive lock) won't trigger this > > warning. Patch below. This would, however, also get rid of any warnings > > for run_workqueue recursion. Which again we may or may not want, the > > code inidicates that it should be allowed up to a depth of three. > > > > However, the question whether we should allow flush_workqueue from > > within a struct work is mainly an API policy issue; it doesn't hurt to > > flush a workqueue from within a work, but it is probably nearer the > > intent to use targeted cancel_work_sync() or such. OTOH, one could > > imagine situations where multiple different work structs are on that > > workqueue belonging to the same subsystem and then the general > > flush_scheduled_work() call is the only way to guarantee nothing is on > > scheduled at a given point... I don't feel qualified to make the > > decision for or against allowing this use of the API at this point. > > > > Marc, do you have an easy way to trigger this warning? Could you verify > > that it goes away with the patch below applied? > > just booting into X is enough. > > I applied the patch, but now I get: > > ================================= > [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] > 2.6.23-rc1-mm2 #4 > --------------------------------- > inconsistent {softirq-on-W} -> {in-softirq-W} usage. > swapper/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes: > (rpc_credcache_lock){-+..}, at: [] _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x17/0x60 > {softirq-on-W} state was registered at: > [] __lock_acquire+0x650/0x1030 > [] lock_acquire+0x61/0x80 > [] _spin_lock+0x2c/0x40 > [] _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x17/0x60 > [] put_rpccred+0x5d/0x100 [sunrpc] > [] rpcauth_unbindcred+0x21/0x60 [sunrpc] > [] a0 [sunrpc] > [] rpc_call_sync+0x30/0x40 [sunrpc] > [] rpcb_register+0xdb/0x180 [sunrpc] > [] svc_register+0x93/0x160 [sunrpc] > [] __svc_create+0x1ee/0x220 [sunrpc] > [] svc_create+0x13/0x20 [sunrpc] > [] nfs_callback_up+0x82/0x120 [nfs] > [] nfs_get_client+0x176/0x390 [nfs] > [] nfs4_set_client+0x31/0x190 [nfs] > [] nfs4_create_server+0x63/0x3b0 [nfs] > [] nfs4_get_sb+0x346/0x5b0 [nfs] > [] vfs_kern_mount+0x94/0x110 > [] do_mount+0x1f2/0x7d0 > [] sys_mount+0x66/0xa0 > [] syscall_call+0x7/0xb > [] 0xffffffff > irq event stamp: 5277830 > hardirqs last enabled at (5277830): [] kmem_cache_free+0x8a/0xc0 > hardirqs last disabled at (5277829): [] kmem_cache_free+0x52/0xc0 > softirqs last enabled at (5277798): [] __do_softirq+0xa3/0xc0 > softirqs last disabled at (5277817): [] do_softirq+0x47/0x50 > > other info that might help us debug this: > no locks held by swapper/0. > > stack backtrace: > [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30 > [] show_trace+0x12/0x20 > [] dump_stack+0x15/0x20 > [] print_usage_bug+0x153/0x160 > [] mark_lock+0x449/0x620 > [] __lock_acquire+0x604/0x1030 > [] lock_acquire+0x61/0x80 > [] _spin_lock+0x2c/0x40 > [] _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x17/0x60 > [] put_rpccred+0x5d/0x100 [sunrpc] > [] nfs_free_delegation_callback+0x13/0x20 [nfs] > [] __rcu_process_callbacks+0x6a/0x1c0 > [] rcu_process_callbacks+0x12/0x30 > [] tasklet_action+0x38/0x80 > [] __do_softirq+0x55/0xc0 > [] do_softirq+0x47/0x50 > [] irq_exit+0x35/0x40 > [] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x43/0x80 > [] apic_timer_interrupt+0x33/0x38 > [] cpuidle_idle_call+0x6f/0x90 > [] cpu_idle+0x43/0x70 > [] rest_init+0x47/0x50 > [] start_kernel+0x22a/0x2b0 > [<00000000>] 0x0 > ======================= That is a different matter. I assume this patch should suffice to fix the above problem. Trond --=-uAbj9Yeafew4w7bjZykd Content-Disposition: inline; filename=linux-2.6.23-005-dont_call_rpc_putcred_from_rcu.dif Content-Type: message/rfc822; name=linux-2.6.23-005-dont_call_rpc_putcred_from_rcu.dif From: Trond Myklebust Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:18:34 -0400 NFSv4: Don't call put_rpccred() from an rcu callback Subject: No Subject Message-Id: <1186417445.6616.24.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Doing so would require us to introduce bh-safe locks into put_rpccred(). Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust --- fs/nfs/delegation.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/delegation.c b/fs/nfs/delegation.c index 20ac403..c55a761 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/delegation.c +++ b/fs/nfs/delegation.c @@ -20,10 +20,8 @@ #include "delegation.h" #include "internal.h" -static void nfs_free_delegation(struct nfs_delegation *delegation) +static void nfs_do_free_delegation(struct nfs_delegation *delegation) { - if (delegation->cred) - put_rpccred(delegation->cred); kfree(delegation); } @@ -31,7 +29,18 @@ static void nfs_free_delegation_callback(struct rcu_head *head) { struct nfs_delegation *delegation = container_of(head, struct nfs_delegation, rcu); - nfs_free_delegation(delegation); + nfs_do_free_delegation(delegation); +} + +static void nfs_free_delegation(struct nfs_delegation *delegation) +{ + struct rpc_cred *cred; + + cred = rcu_dereference(delegation->cred); + rcu_assign_pointer(delegation->cred, NULL); + call_rcu(&delegation->rcu, nfs_free_delegation_callback); + if (cred) + put_rpccred(cred); } static int nfs_delegation_claim_locks(struct nfs_open_context *ctx, struct nfs4_state *state) @@ -166,7 +175,7 @@ static int nfs_do_return_delegation(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_delegation * int res = 0; res = nfs4_proc_delegreturn(inode, delegation->cred, &delegation->stateid); - call_rcu(&delegation->rcu, nfs_free_delegation_callback); + nfs_free_delegation(delegation); return res; } @@ -448,7 +457,7 @@ restart: spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock); rcu_read_unlock(); if (delegation != NULL) - call_rcu(&delegation->rcu, nfs_free_delegation_callback); + nfs_free_delegation(delegation); goto restart; } rcu_read_unlock(); --=-uAbj9Yeafew4w7bjZykd-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/