lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
    > you try to put the blame into distribution makers' shoes but in reality, 
    > had the kernel stepped forward with a neat .config option sooner
    > (combined with a neat boot option as well to turn it off), we'd have had
    > noatime systems 10 years ago. A new entry into relnotes and done. It's

    Sorry Ingo, having been in the distribution business for over ten years I
    have to disagree. Kernel options that magically totally change the kernel
    API and behaviour are exactly what a vendor does *NOT* want to have.

    > Distro makers did not dare to do this sooner because some kernel
    > developers came forward with these mostly bogus arguments ... The impact
    > of atime is far better understood by the kernel community, so it is the
    > responsibility of _us_ to signal such things towards distributors, not
    > the other way around.

    You are trying to put a bogus divide between kernel community and
    developer community. Yet you know perfectly well that a large part of the
    kernel community yourself included work for distribution vendors and are
    actively building the distribution kernels.

    You are perfectly positioned to provide timing examples to the Fedora
    development team and make the case for FC8 beta going out that way. You
    are perfectly able to propose, build and submit a FC7 extras package of
    tuning which people can try in the meantime, but you haven't do so.

    Other people in this discussion can do likewise for Debian, SuSE etc.

    Your argument appears to be "I can't be bothered to use the due processes
    of the distribution but I can do it quickly with an ugly kernel hack".
    That is not the right approach. Propose it with your presented numbers to
    fedora-devel and I'll be happy to back up such a proposal for the next FC
    as will many other kernel folk I'm sure.

    Heck, go write a piece for LWN with the benchmark numbers and how to
    change your atime options. You'll make Jon happy and lots of folks read
    it and will give feedback on improvements as a result.

    Alan
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-05 14:47    [W:0.023 / U:121.248 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site