![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > Distro makers did not dare to do this sooner because some kernel > developers came forward with these mostly bogus arguments ... The impact > of atime is far better understood by the kernel community, so it is the > responsibility of _us_ to signal such things towards distributors, not > the other way around. Pretty much. AFAICS there was never a "policy decision" on the part of distro makers to begin with. The kernel had its default -- atime -- and the distros ran with that. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-08-05 09:07 [W:0.559 / U:0.220 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||