[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH/RFT] finish i386 and x86-64 sysdata conversion
On 8/5/07, Muli Ben-Yehuda <> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 01:49:57AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > Can you change
> > pci_scan_bus_with_sysdata(int busno)
> > to
> > pci_scan_bus_on_node(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, int node)?
> Do you anticipate passing in a different pci_ops or node?
> In any case please remember I am aiming for the minimal "obviously
> correc" change for 2.6.23...
> > pci_scan_bus_with_sysdata(int busno) make me feel that i need feed one
> > sysdata as on param for it.
> Yeah, lousy name, but the best I came up with. Runner up was
> 'x86_pci_scan_bus', which is I think worse?

pci_scan_bus_on_node(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, int node)
x86_pci_scan_root_bus(int bus)
pci_scan_bus_on_node(bus, &pci_root_ops, -1);

i need node as one param for my patch later in irq.c and legacy.c

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-05 18:43    [W:0.065 / U:2.044 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site