lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH/RFT] finish i386 and x86-64 sysdata conversion
    On 8/5/07, Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com> wrote:
    > On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 01:49:57AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
    >
    > > Can you change
    > > pci_scan_bus_with_sysdata(int busno)
    > > to
    > > pci_scan_bus_on_node(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, int node)?
    >
    > Do you anticipate passing in a different pci_ops or node?
    > In any case please remember I am aiming for the minimal "obviously
    > correc" change for 2.6.23...
    >
    > > pci_scan_bus_with_sysdata(int busno) make me feel that i need feed one
    > > sysdata as on param for it.
    >
    > Yeah, lousy name, but the best I came up with. Runner up was
    > 'x86_pci_scan_bus', which is I think worse?
    >
    or

    pci_scan_bus_on_node(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, int node)
    x86_pci_scan_root_bus(int bus)
    {
    pci_scan_bus_on_node(bus, &pci_root_ops, -1);
    }

    i need node as one param for my patch later in irq.c and legacy.c

    YH
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-05 18:43    [W:0.065 / U:0.420 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site