lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
    From
    Date
    Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes:
    >
    > yeah, it's really ugly. But otherwise i've got no real complaint about
    > ext3 - with the obligatory qualification that "noatime,nodiratime" in
    > /etc/fstab is a must. This speeds up things very visibly - especially
    > when lots of files are accessed. It's kind of weird that every Linux
    > desktop and server is hurt by a noticeable IO performance slowdown due
    > to the constant atime updates, while there's just two real users of it:
    > tmpwatch [which can be configured to use ctime so it's not a big issue]
    > and some backup tools. (Ok, and mail-notify too i guess.) Out of tens of
    > thousands of applications. So for most file workloads we give Windows a
    > 20%-30% performance edge, for almost nothing. (for RAM-starved kernel
    > builds the performance difference between atime and noatime+nodiratime
    > setups is more on the order of 40%)

    I always thought the right solution would be to just sync atime only
    very very lazily. This means if a inode is only dirty because of an
    atime update put it on a "only write out when there is nothing to do
    or the memory is really needed" list.

    -Andi
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-05 01:35    [W:0.025 / U:31.120 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site