lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2
    Is it actually necessary to change the license?  With the dual-license, 
    you can keep a single code-base for both BSD and Linux platforms, which
    seems terribly important to me. It'd be awful to lose that. It would
    be a maintenance nightmare for BSD. Is it even possible--in real life,
    I mean--to accept GPLed patches into a BSD project? Nightmare, I tell you!
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-30 15:05    [W:0.044 / U:29.448 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site