Messages in this thread | | | From | Bill Davidsen <> | Subject | Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21) | Date | Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:54:32 -0400 |
| |
Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 12:42:02AM -0700, Natalie Protasevich wrote: >> ... >> Then I think bugzilla needs: >> adding more categories such as security, > > "security" would be a flag like "regression", not a category. > >> system calls (lots of >> implementation suggestions for posix and non-posix ones), >> ... > > Bugzilla is for tracking bugs, not for discussing possible > kernel features. > > Tracking feature or implementation suggestions wouldn't make sense. > Consider e.g. that there are several people on linux-kernel who often > write what they think the kernel should do but who never write a single > line of code themselves. There's no value in tracking such stuff. > That's an interesting viewpoint, only programmers have useful thoughts... ignoring users, people who have CS degrees but don't code, etc. I would think there's value in any rational suggestions which include technical justification for the suggestion.
-- Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |