[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2
    > Aren't patches made against the kernel GPL'd if the author doesn't
    > explicitly grant them more liberal BSD license in addition?

    That would be the normal assumption.

    > The problem then comes in taking the patches that were only made
    > available against GPL code and reshipping them under the BSD license
    > without the author explicitly agreeing to this.
    > What if a patch spans both code that is pure GPL and code imported
    > from BSD, how do you license it?

    See the acpi codebase for a worked example.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-29 21:41    [W:0.021 / U:54.336 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site