![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 09:49:38PM +0200, J??rn Engel wrote: > >>On Tue, 28 August 2007 12:05:58 -0700, clameter@sgi.com wrote: >> >>> >>>- index = *ppos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT; >>>- offset = *ppos & ~PAGE_CACHE_MASK; >>>+ index = page_cache_index(mapping, *ppos); >>>+ offset = page_cache_offset(mapping, *ppos); >> >>Part of me feels inclined to marge this patch now because it makes the >>code more readable, even if page_cache_index() is implemented as >>#define page_cache_index(mapping, pos) ((pos) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) >> >>I know there is little use in yet another global search'n'replace >>wankfest and Andrew might wash my mouth just for mentioning it. Still, >>hard to dislike this part of your patch. > > > Yes, I I suggested that before. Andrew seems to somehow hate this > patchset, but even if we don;'t get it in the lowercase macros are much > much better then the current PAGE_CACHE_* confusion. I don't mind the change either. The open coded macros are very recognisable, but it isn't hard to have a typo and get one slightly wrong. If it goes upstream now it wouldn't have the mapping argument though, would it? Or the need to replace PAGE_CACHE_SIZE I guess. -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-08-28 23:53 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||