lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -rt 1/8] introduce PICK_FUNCTION
Daniel Walker wrote:
> PICK_FUNCTION() is similar to the other PICK_OP style macros, and was
> created to replace them all. I used variable argument macros to handle
> PICK_FUNC_2ARG/PICK_FUNC_1ARG. Otherwise the marcos are similar to the
> original macros used for semaphores. The entire system is used to do a
> compile time switch between two different locking APIs. For example,
> real spinlocks (raw_spinlock_t) and mutexes (or sleeping spinlocks).
>
> This new macro replaces all the duplication from lock type to lock type.
> The result of this patch, and the next two, is a fairly nice simplification,
> and consolidation. Although the seqlock changes are larger than the originals
> I think over all the patchset is worth while.
>
> Incorporated peterz's suggestion to not require TYPE_EQUAL() to only
> use pointers.

How come this is cc'ed to lkml? Is it something that is relevant to
the mainline kernel... or?

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-29 01:47    [W:0.052 / U:1.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site