![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 08:46 -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > If having both a labeled networking and NetLabel maintainer entry is a > problem then how about the patch below? I don't think it is. > -NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel, CIPSO, Labeled IPsec, SECMARK) > +NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel/CIPSO, Labeled IPsec, SECMARK) > P: Paul Moore > M: paul.moore@hp.com > +W: http://netlabel.sf.net (NetLabel/CIPSO) > L: netdev@vger.kernel.org > S: Maintained My preference would be for something like: NETLABEL and CIPSO P: Paul Moore M: paul.moore@hp.com W: http://netlabel.sf.net L: netdev@vger.kernel.org S: Maintained F: Documentation/netlabel/ F: include/net/netlabel.h F: net/netlabel/ Labeled IPsec and SECMARK P: Paul Moore M: paul.moore@hp.com L: netdev@vger.kernel.org S: Supported F: include/linux/netfilter/*SECMARK* F: net/netfilter/*SECMARK* I would like to add appropriate file patterns for each block. Also, I'm not sure of the Supported/Maintained status of each block. The distinction is supposed to be: Supported: Someone is actually paid to look after this. Maintained: Someone actually looks after it. Could you please clarify those for me? cheers, Joe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-08-28 16:49 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||