[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
    On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:12:56 +0200 Jes Sorensen wrote:

    > Arjan van de Ven wrote:
    > > On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:01:55 +0200
    > >
    > >> But replacing the flawed KS list with one based on actual
    > >> contributors, from the git logs as I proposed last week, doesn't seem
    > >> silly.

    I agree.

    > > to some degree the KS list is based on that git logs thing ;)
    Good thing you put a ;) there, Arjan.

    > Yes, as well as 12 committee members, of which 5 didn't even comply with
    > their own git commit requirement last time I checked. Not to mention the
    > 10 seats sold to sponsors (presuming it goes like in previous years,
    > with each sponsor being awarded one grease slot per sponsorship).

    Yes, I'm not fond of the PC automatic invites either.
    (that's Program Committee, not politically correct or other PC

    > Based on the published list of invitees (which didn't seem to include
    > the seats sold off) that means 25% of the people who can vote for the
    > TAB were not given a vote based on their contributions.
    > Of course this matches the voting system in some countries, but just
    > because a lot of places rely on broken systems, that shouldn't encourage
    > the TAB to do the same.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-27 17:07    [W:0.021 / U:8.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site