lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
On 27/08/07, Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 13:38 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > On 27/08/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
[..]
> > > I'm not sure that we need one, really. Any bugs in a stable release can be
> > > handled via email and/or bugzilla as we are presently doing?
> > >
> > > What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just
> > > getting lost. Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting
> > > transitioned into bugzilla for tracking?
> >
> > I can copy all regression reports into Bugzilla after each release.
>
> Should we get the regression field fix before? Or had you planned on
> just bypassing that completely ?

IMO solution proposed by David http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/27/21 seems
to be most reasonable.

>
> Daniel
>
>

Regards,
Michal

--
LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-27 17:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site