lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
    On 27/08/07, Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:
    > On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 13:38 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
    > > On 27/08/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
    [..]
    > > > I'm not sure that we need one, really. Any bugs in a stable release can be
    > > > handled via email and/or bugzilla as we are presently doing?
    > > >
    > > > What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just
    > > > getting lost. Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting
    > > > transitioned into bugzilla for tracking?
    > >
    > > I can copy all regression reports into Bugzilla after each release.
    >
    > Should we get the regression field fix before? Or had you planned on
    > just bypassing that completely ?

    IMO solution proposed by David http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/27/21 seems
    to be most reasonable.

    >
    > Daniel
    >
    >

    Regards,
    Michal

    --
    LOG
    http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-27 17:29    [W:0.020 / U:59.436 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site