lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromDenys Vlasenko <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
DateFri, 24 Aug 2007 13:50:44 +0100
On Thursday 16 August 2007 00:22, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Satyam Sharma writes:> In the kernel we use atomic variables in precisely those situations
> where a variable is potentially accessed concurrently by multiple
> CPUs, and where each CPU needs to see updates done by other CPUs in a
> timely fashion.  That is what they are for.  Therefore the compiler
> must not cache values of atomic variables in registers; each
> atomic_read must result in a load and each atomic_set must result in a
> store.  Anything else will just lead to subtle bugs.

Amen.
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-24 14:55    [from the cache]
©2003-2008