[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] dma: override "dma_flags_set_dmaflush" for sn-ia64
    James Bottomley wrote:
    > Hmm, didn't see the email ... but I'm probably not cc'd on all the
    > thread. However ... it isn't that you couldn't do it ... it's that you
    > don't want to do it because it's faster to violate the spec ... like all
    > those nice ATA devices that lie about having a cache and then let you
    > power down with uncommitted data still in it ... they work much faster
    > for HDIO tests ... and who ever switches their box off?


    I didn't do it, I don't know who did it, but sure we can try and track
    them down and line them up outside .....

    Point is that this is how the chips were done and they are out there in
    numbers. It makes things a *lot* faster to violate the spec in such a
    system, yes it sucks, but thats how things are. It wouldn't be the first
    time someone violated the PCI spec in their implementation and I am
    pretty sure it won't be the last.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-23 10:49    [W:0.023 / U:3.644 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site