lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:

> On 22/08/07, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> >
> > > Oops, never mind - tail still follows secmark, so that shouldn't matter.
> > > So I'm not sure why we are getting a bad value for secmark here - should
> > > be initialized to zero and never modified unless there is an iptables
> > > secmark rule.
> >
> > Michal, do you see this in current git?
>
> No, I do not see this problem in 2.6.23. I had similar problem last
> month, but it is fixed now.
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/12/362

The previous problem is theoretically unrelated. It arose via a separate
mechanism which can't be used at the same as the one you're seeing now in
the logs.

So this either looks like a problem which has gone unnoticed and was
inadvertently fixed at some point, or is unique to the 2.6.20 stable
series.


- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-22 18:37    [W:0.278 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site