lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] genirq: handle_fasteoi_irq vs IRQ_INPROGRESS && IRQ_DISABLED
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:17:00AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've still some doubts about these irq handlers and I hope somebody
> could explain some of these (despite my problems with earlier such
> explanations, sorry...):
>
> 1. According to some well-known Intel's manual (vol.3A page 8-41)
> lapic can interrupt irq handler dispatching higher-priority irq; it
> seems, such an event is possible during handle_IRQ_event, and would
> be treated by "common" handlers with IRQ_INPROGRESS; but:

OOPS!!! Of course, I got this wrong again: this IRQ_INPROGRESS is
for another irq... Sorry!

But, then, it seems such IRQ_INPROGRESS shouldn't be possible at all
with properly working lapic? Or do I miss something...

Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-21 12:37    [W:0.243 / U:0.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site