[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
    H. Peter Anvin wrote:

    > Yup... it should probably be pointed out the reason the old kernel
    > worked was nothing but pure dumb luck. This was a GNU ld change which
    > needed to be undone for klibc. It's unfortunate that stock x86-64
    > binaries leave as little of a null pointer range as they do, but that's
    > life, unfortunately. The other alternative is to map klibc just below
    > the 2 GB point, which would also work, but the old way broke when the ld
    > change went in. As previously stated, klibc-1.4.35 or higher fixes this.
    > -hpa

    Just for the record: The kernel with the PIE patch boots perfectly
    using the klibc 1.5 shared binaries on my machine.

    Uli Kunitz
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-02 22:45    [W:0.022 / U:10.744 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site