lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: tracking MAINTAINERS versus tracking SUBSYSTEMS
From
Date
On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 13:35 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> $ show_subsystem drivers/bluetooth/bpa10x.c
> BLUETOOTH

"what's a subsystem"?
I'm not sure there is an appropriate definition.
If there is an appropriate definition, why
should anyone care what subsystem a particular
file is in?

> 1) it reduces the MAINTAINERS file back to what it should be in the
> first place -- a simple reference list of each kernel subsystem, and
> who's responsible for it, so that constant reshuffling of files or
> directories in a particular subsystem doesn't require constant
> updating of the MAINTAINERS file.

I'd still be happy if MAINTAINERS went away.
I'm not sure what good it does other than have
a link to mailing lists that otherwise might not
be CC'd on patches.

> thoughts?

For user submission of bug reports, perhaps it'd be
more useful to have a submitkernelbugreport script
and a network enabled "dispatch bug report" to
appropriate maintainers service.

Try something out and see what happens.

Good luck. Joe


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-19 02:37    [W:0.060 / U:4.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site