lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] exec: simplify ->sighand switching
Date
> There is no any reason to do recalc_sigpending() after changing ->sighand.
> To begin with, recalc_sigpending() does not take ->sighand into account.

I agree. I think that call dates from before some other cleanups in that
code, when ->signal was changed there. At the time, it was the most
conservative change to leave recalc_sigpending in case the side effects it
used to have were desireable (we've since decided to change those anyway).


Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-19 01:13    [W:0.090 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site