[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures

    On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Paul Mackerras wrote:

    > Satyam Sharma writes:
    > > I wonder if this'll generate smaller and better code than _both_ the
    > > other atomic_read_volatile() variants. Would need to build allyesconfig
    > > on lots of diff arch's etc to test the theory though.
    > I'm sure it would be a tiny effect.
    > This whole thread is arguing about effects that are quite
    > insignificant.

    Hmm, the fact that this thread became what it did, probably means that
    most developers on this list do not mind thinking/arguing about effects
    or optimizations that are otherwise "tiny". But yeah, they are tiny
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-17 12:13    [W:0.026 / U:3.560 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site