![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:56:11 +0800 Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 14:31 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:> > On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 10:17 -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: > > > Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> writes: > > > >> > > > After spending quite a bit of time trying to resolve this on more than > > > > one occassion, using rather complex and ulgy approaches, it turns out > > > > that just delaying the hashing of the dentry until the create operation > > > > work fine.> > > > There seems to be an unexpected problem with the patch after removal of > > the d_rehash line left in the original by mistake.> > > > I see you haven't got to this yet, probably because I used your old > email address, Actually my cursor has advanced that far, but you said it didn't work right yet. > so to save hassle, here is the final patch and the> description. OK, thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2007-08-17 06:57 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||