![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> (and yes, it is perfectly legitimate to > want a non-volatile read for a data type that you also want to do > atomic RMW operations on) ...which is undefined behaviour in C (and GCC) when that data is declared volatile, which is a good argument against implementing atomics that way in itself. Segher - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-08-18 00:19 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||