lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Early printk behaviour
On 8/17/07, Robin Getz <rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> wrote:
> On Fri 17 Aug 2007 03:49, Gerd Hoffmann pondered:
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > >> Hmm, sort of, although I didn't think about the case of no real console
> > >> replacing the early console. The intention of the patch is to have a
> > >> smooth handover from the boot console to the real console. And, yes, if
> > >> no real console is ever registered the boot console keeps running ...
> > >
> > > i think it also occurs in the case where real console != early console
> >
> > No. At least not of the boot console has the CON_BOOT flag set as it
> > should. Last message you'll see on the boot console is the handover
> > printk, telling you which real console device prints the following
> > messages. Whenever early and real console go to the physical device or
> > not doesn't matter.
> >
> > >> So you can either let it running and *not* mark it __init, so it can
> > >> keep on going without breaking. Or you can explicitly unregister your
> > >> boot console at some point, maybe using a late_initcall.
> > >
> > > wouldnt a common kernel late_initcall() be more appropriate ? if
> > > early console hasnt switched over (for whatever reason), then kill it
> >
> > Hmm, yes, should be doable in generic code. Check whenever the current
> > console has CON_BOOT set and if so unregister it.
>
> Something like:
>
> Index: kernel/printk.c
> ===================================================================
> --- kernel/printk.c (revision 3568)
> +++ kernel/printk.c (working copy)
> @@ -1104,6 +1104,22 @@
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_console);
>
> +int __init disable_boot_consoles(void)
> +{
> + struct console *con;
> +
> + for (con = console_drivers; con; con = con->next) {
> + if (con->flags & CON_BOOT) {
> + printk(KERN_INFO "Unregister BootConsole %s%d\n",
> + con->name, con->index);
> + unregister_console(con);
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +late_initcall(disable_boot_consoles);

is there any need for a return value then ?
void __init disable_boot_consoles(void);

and if we dont think anyone else wants to call it ...
static void __init disable_boot_consoles(void);
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-17 23:27    [W:0.049 / U:0.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site