![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 03:48:54PM -0400, Chris Snook wrote: >> >Can you find an actual atomic_read code snippet there that is > >broken without the volatile modifier?> > A whole bunch of atomic_read uses will be broken without the volatile > modifier once we start removing barriers that aren't needed if volatile > behavior is guaranteed. Could you please cite the file/function names so we can see whether removing the barrier makes sense? Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-08-17 02:05 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||