[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC)
    On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:

    > > Honestly, I don't. They very much do not solve the problem, they just
    > > displace it.
    > Well perhaps it doesn't work for networked swap, because dirty accounting
    > doesn't work the same way with anonymous memory... but for _filesystems_,
    > right?

    Regular reclaim also cannot immediately write out pages. Writes are
    usually deferred. If you have too many anonymous pages in regular reclaim
    then you can have the same issues.

    The difference is that recursive reclaim does not trigger writeout at
    the moment but we could address that by having a pageout list that then
    starts writes from another context. Then both reclaims would be able to
    trigger writeout.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-16 22:29    [W:0.018 / U:17.860 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site