[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Documentation: fix getdelays.c example -l option and segv

>> Is this really required? a sleep() in the code. Why do we do multiple
>> send_cmd()'s in the do loop? I'll test and get back.
> I needed to send another command to receive more data. Without the per
> loop send_cmd, I never got any more stats.
> Should we receive more data without the additional send_cmd? I've been
> running with:
> ./getdelays -d -p 1 -l

Interesting, we never used -l that way. We used -l to get data for all
exiting tasks

./getdelays -d -l

For the usage you've mentioned, I'd use

while :
sleep 2
./getdelays -p 1 -d

I guess your changes change getdelays and since there are other ways
to obtaining the same data, I'd remove the last bit of changes made
to send the TGID often to get data.

> Mikey

Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-15 13:23    [W:0.048 / U:3.212 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site