[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
Christoph Lameter writes:

> A volatile default would disable optimizations for atomic_read.
> atomic_read without volatile would allow for full optimization by the
> compiler. Seems that this is what one wants in many cases.

Name one such case.

An atomic_read should do a load from memory. If the programmer puts
an atomic_read() in the code then the compiler should emit a load for
it, not re-use a value returned by a previous atomic_read. I do not
believe it would ever be useful for the compiler to collapse two
atomic_read statements into a single load.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-16 04:27    [W:0.265 / U:4.656 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site