lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 08:53:16AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 05:49:50PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 08:30:23AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks. But I don't need a summary of the thread, I'm asking
> > > for an extant code snippet in our kernel that benefits from
> > > the volatile change and is not part of a busy-wait.
> >
> > Sorry, can't help you there. I really do believe that the information
> > you need (as opposed to the specific item you are asking for) really
> > has been put forth in this thread.
>
> That only leads me to believe that such a code snippet simply
> does not exist.

Whatever...

Thanx, Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-16 03:21    [W:0.249 / U:0.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site