![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 08:05:38PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > > > I don't know if this here is affected: > > Yes, I think it is. You're clearly expecting the read to actually happen > when you call get_hpsb_generation(). It's clearly not a busy-loop, so > cpu_relax() sounds pointless / wrong solution for this case, so I'm now > somewhat beginning to appreciate the motivation behind this series :-) Nope, we're calling schedule which is a rather heavy-weight barrier. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2007-08-15 14:57 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||