[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: kfree(0) - ok?

On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 15:59 -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a quick question.
> I'm trying to resurrect a patch from the Linux-tiny patch suite,
> to do accounting of kmalloc memory allocations. In testing it
> with Linux 2.6.22, I've found a large number of kfrees of
> NULL pointers.
> Is this considered OK? Or should I examine the offenders
> to see if something is coded badly?

kfree(NULL) is explicitly ok and it saves code size to not check
(the idea is that kfree(kmalloc(...)); is a guaranteed safe nop)

NULL is not 0 though.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-15 01:21    [W:0.102 / U:0.284 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site