lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 12 Aug 2007 16:58:08 +0800
FromWU Fengguang <>
SubjectRe: [BUGFIX] NULL pointer dereference in __vm_enough_memory()
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:48:31PM +0800, WU Fengguang wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:31:09PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 "Balbir Singh" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >> Shouldn't we just not stop vm accounting for kernel threads?
> > >>
> > > 
> > > Could be.  It'd help heaps if we knew which patch in -mm caused
> > > this, but from a quick peek it seems to me that mainline should be
> > > vulnerable as well.
> > 
> > Thats a valid point. It would be interesting to see what the overcommit
> > setting was, when the panic occurred.
> 
> FYI, I do have nondefault overcommit settings:
> 
> vm.overcommit_memory = 2
> vm.lowmem_reserve_ratio = 1 1

Yes, the bug disappears when changing to default overcommit_memory!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-12 11:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2008