lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 12 Aug 2007 13:48:31 +0800
FromWU Fengguang <>
SubjectRe: [BUGFIX] NULL pointer dereference in __vm_enough_memory()
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:31:09PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 "Balbir Singh" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >> Shouldn't we just not stop vm accounting for kernel threads?
> >>
> > 
> > Could be.  It'd help heaps if we knew which patch in -mm caused
> > this, but from a quick peek it seems to me that mainline should be
> > vulnerable as well.
> 
> Thats a valid point. It would be interesting to see what the overcommit
> setting was, when the panic occurred.

FYI, I do have nondefault overcommit settings:

vm.overcommit_memory = 2
vm.lowmem_reserve_ratio = 1 1

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-12 07:51    [from the cache]
©2003-2008