![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:31:09PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 "Balbir Singh" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >>> > >> Shouldn't we just not stop vm accounting for kernel threads? > >> > > > > Could be. It'd help heaps if we knew which patch in -mm caused > > this, but from a quick peek it seems to me that mainline should be > > vulnerable as well. > > Thats a valid point. It would be interesting to see what the overcommit > setting was, when the panic occurred. FYI, I do have nondefault overcommit settings: vm.overcommit_memory = 2 vm.lowmem_reserve_ratio = 1 1 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-08-12 07:51 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||