[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] Add ETHTOOL_[GS]FLAGS sub-ioctls
    David Miller wrote:
    > From: Ben Greear <>

    >> I believe LRO is going to have to be disabled for routing/bridging,
    >> so the stack will probably need to become aware of it at some point...
    > The packet will be GSO'd on output I believe, so it won't
    > break anything.
    > Alternatively, we could make the driver only LRO accumulate if the
    > packet is unicast and matches one of the MAC's programmed into the
    > chip.

    I think even this would fail if you are doing something clever with
    NAT or other iptables stuff. Probably we're going to have to put this
    in the hands of the users..who hopefully can determine whether they
    can allow LRO or not...

    For GSO on output, is there a generic fallback for any driver that
    does not specifically implement GSO?


    Ben Greear <>
    Candela Technologies Inc

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-11 00:43    [W:0.026 / U:0.284 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site