[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 23/25] [PATCH] paravirt hooks for arch initialization
Jeremy Fitzhardinge escreveu:
> Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
>> On 8/9/07, Alan Cox <> wrote:
>>>> What's the EBDA actually used for? The only place which seems to use
>>>> ebda_addr is in the e820 code to avoid that area as RAM.
>>> It belongs to the firmware.
>> Wouldn't it be better, then, to just skip this step unconditionally if
>> we are running a paravirtualized guest? What do we from doing it?
> It's better to make discover_ebda() quietly cope with a missing ebda for
> whatever reason. We could add an explicit interface to paravirt_ops to
> handle this one little corner, but it isn't very important, not very
> general and really its just clutter. Its much better to have things
> cope with being virtualized quietly on their own rather than hit them
> all with the pv_ops hammer. pv_ops is really for things where the
> hypervisor-specific code really has to get actively involved.
I think the idea you gave me earlier of using probe_kernel_address could
work. Xen/lguest/put_yours_here that won't use an ebda would then have
to unmap the page, to make sure a read would fault.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-10 21:21    [W:0.150 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site