Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:50:05 +0200 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ? |
| |
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 04:19:36PM +1000, Matthew Hawkins wrote: > On 8/1/07, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote: > > But there's not much value in benchmarking if an important part of the > > performance critical code is in some undebuggable driver... > > In this case we don't care about the performance of the video driver. > This isn't a race to see who can get the most fps. The driver can be > thought of as a black box so long as comparative benchmarks are done > with the same driver. >...
What if your "black box" e.g. uses the BKL?
> Matt
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |