![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hua Zhong wrote: > I don't think it's the code superiority that decided the fate of the two > schedulers. When CFS came out, the fate of SD was pretty much already > decided. The fact is that Linus trusts Ingo, and as such he wants to merge > Ingo's code. Of course I cannot say it's wrong, and Ingo's earned this > it through years of hard work, but let's not kid ourselves and deny the > obvious fact. I agree with you here. It's not simply code superiority that matters but a balance of attitude and the code's corroboration with numbers. Both had numbers to show but I think that one's attitude was preferred over the other. > I think Con was simply too frustrated after years of rejection. He could > have been more diplomatic this time round. But no matter how he'd have > done, once Ingo decided to write a new scheduler, the outcome was pretty > much already decided. > > SD (and years of Con's work) inspired CFS. This is a fact. No matter how > smart and capable Ingo is, he needs inspiration to keep the good work going. > So I wish Ingo could work more closely with others and let them share a bit > more credit which would just produce even better work. I don't see where credit was lacking. As far as I've observed, SD's author was given acknowledgment on what he did and even got praise. Thank you very much. Best Regards, Carlo -- Carlo Florendo Softare Engineer/Network Co-Administrator Astra Philippines Inc. UP-Ayala Technopark, UP Campus Diliman 1101 Quezon City, Philippines http://www.astra.ph -- The Astra Group of Companies 5-3-11 Sekido, Tama City Tokyo 206-0011, Japan http://www.astra.co.jp - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-08-01 09:11 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||