Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] RT: Add priority-queuing and priority-inheritance to workqueue infrastructure | From | Daniel Walker <> | Date | Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:39:59 -0700 |
| |
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 22:26 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> No, the "tail" option has nothing to do with prioritize, we can't remove > it. Please look at the code.
So you insert a work struct that executes last which wakes the flushing thread?
> Also, flush_workqueue() must not be delayed by the new incoming work_struct's, > the change like this breaks this assumption.
True ..
Daniel
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |