[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/7] Simple Performance Counters: x86_64 support
    > But then the numbers are not comparable across systems.

    That would only matter if you're interested in absolute system
    performance of different systems.

    But comparable performance testing in general only makes sense when you
    only change one variable: either you change the hardware or
    you change the software. If you change both at the same time
    you'll never know where the difference comes from.

    I assume this facility is aimed at software performance testing:
    this means it doesn't make much sense to compare numbers
    between different systems; just relative numbers on the same
    system with different software.

    If you want absolute comparable system performance benchmarks I don't think
    micro-instrumenting the kernel is a good approach.

    But for relative performance cycles are fine. Anyways if you really
    wanted to do ns it's possible too, but far more complicated to do correctly.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-01 20:29    [W:0.018 / U:54.676 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site