lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 7 Jul 2007 14:09:19 +0200
FromPavel Machek <>
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
On Thu 2007-07-05 10:15:01, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki writes:> > > This is incompatible with the code in kernel/power/main.c, since we only
> > disable the nonboot CPUs after devices have been suspended.  Do you think that
> > your framework can be modified to work without disabling the nonboot CPUs
> > by the user space?> > Sure.  It was a "if it can be done in userspace, do it in userspace"
> kind of decision, but I'm not wedded to it.
> 
> I actually do want to converge to using the generic suspend-to-ram
> code on powerbooks.  I just want to avoid causing regressions for
> powerbook users, including myself. :)

Curious, do you actually use fuse? Can you try it _with_ freezer and
produce sysrq-t trace of deadlock?
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-07 14:11    [from the cache]
©2003-2008