lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 06 Jul 2007 21:09:34 -0700
From"H. Peter Anvin" <>
SubjectRe: A simpler variant on sys_indirect?
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> The batching has serious problems, not the least of which is that it's a 
> fundamentally more complex interface, and introduces issues like "how do 
> we pass values from one system call to the next". 
> 

Why, we obviously need a Turing-complete language running in kernel 
space (interpreted, of course, to keep it secure.)  Pretty soon we can 
run the whole app in it, and we'll have to have a JIT to make it suck on 
less.  Since it's going to need caffeine, we can call it "Java."

	-hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-07 06:13    [from the cache]
©2003-2008