lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: SATA RAID5 speed drop of 100 MB/s
Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Single Seagate 74Gb SCSI drive (10KRPM)
>
> BlkSz Trd linRd rndRd linWr rndWr linR/W rndR/W
> 4k 1 66.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6/ 0.6 0.4/ 0.2
> 2 0.6 0.6 0.5/ 0.1
> 4 0.7 0.6 0.6/ 0.2
> 16k 1 84.8 2.0 2.5 1.9 2.5/ 2.5 1.6/ 0.6
> 2 2.3 2.1 2.0/ 0.6
> 4 2.7 2.5 2.3/ 0.6
> 64k 1 84.8 7.4 9.3 7.2 9.4/ 9.3 5.8/ 2.2
> 2 8.6 7.9 7.3/ 2.1
> 4 9.9 9.1 8.1/ 2.2
> 128k 1 84.8 13.6 16.7 12.9 16.9/16.6 10.6/ 3.9
> 2 15.6 14.4 13.5/ 3.2
> 4 17.9 16.4 15.7/ 2.7
> 512k 1 84.9 34.0 41.9 33.3 29.0/27.1 22.4/13.2
> 2 36.9 34.5 30.7/ 8.1
> 4 40.5 38.1 33.2/ 8.3
> 1024k 1 83.1 36.0 55.8 34.6 28.2/27.6 20.3/19.4
> 2 45.2 44.1 36.4/ 9.9
> 4 48.1 47.6 40.7/ 7.1
>

<snip>

> The only thing I don't understand is why with larger I/O block
> size we see write speed drop with multiple threads.

Huh? Your data table does not show larger block size dropping write
speed. 47.6 > 38.1 > 16.4.

> And in contrast to the above, here's another test run, now
> with Seagate SATA ST3250620AS ("desktop" class) 250GB
> 7200RPM drive:
>
> BlkSz Trd linRd rndRd linWr rndWr linR/W rndR/W
> 4k 1 47.5 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.3/ 0.3 0.1/ 0.1
> 2 0.3 0.3 0.2/ 0.1
> 4 0.3 0.3 0.2/ 0.2
> 16k 1 78.4 1.1 1.8 1.1 0.9/ 0.9 0.6/ 0.6
> 2 1.2 1.1 0.6/ 0.6
> 4 1.3 1.2 0.6/ 0.6
> 64k 1 78.4 4.3 6.7 4.0 3.5/ 3.5 2.1/ 2.2
> 2 4.5 4.1 2.2/ 2.3
> 4 4.7 4.2 2.3/ 2.4
> 128k 1 78.4 8.0 12.6 7.2 6.2/ 6.2 3.9/ 3.8
> 2 8.2 7.3 4.1/ 4.0
> 4 8.7 7.7 4.3/ 4.3
> 512k 1 78.5 23.1 34.0 20.3 17.1/17.1 11.3/10.7
> 2 23.5 20.6 11.3/11.4
> 4 24.7 21.3 11.6/11.8
> 1024k 1 78.4 34.1 33.5 24.6 19.6/19.5 16.0/12.7
> 2 33.3 24.6 15.4/13.8
> 4 34.3 25.0 14.7/15.0
>
> Here, the (total) I/O speed does not depend on the number
> of threads. From which I conclude that the drive does
> not reorder/optimize commands internally, even if NCQ is
> enabled (queue depth is 32).

While the difference does not appear to be as pronounced as with the WD
drive, the data does show more threads give more total IO. 4.7 > 4.5 >
4.3 in the 64k rndRd test, and the other tests show an increase with
more threads as well.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-06 00:15    [W:2.153 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site