![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:29:32 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:15:50 -0600 > "David Mosberger-Tang" <dmosberger@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This seems crazy to me. Flushing should occur according to the > > *architecture*, not model-by-model. Even if we happen to get "lucky" > > on pre-Montecito CPUs, that doesn't justify such ugly hacks. > BTW, how about the quality of patch[2/4] ? If it is enough well, I want it to be merged.... please.. -Kame - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2007-07-31 05:07 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||