lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)
    Date
    On Saturday 28 July 2007 12:55, Linus Torvalds wrote:

    > So I think the real issue is that we allow that
    > "suspend_devices_and_enter()" code to be compiled without HOTPLUG_CPU in
    > the first place. It's not supposed to work that way.

    I don't see how CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU justifies its own existence.
    This e-mail thread would have never happened if it were simply included
    in CONFIG_SMP, always.

    I agree, of course, that ACPI should never have had to work-around
    this by selecting HOTPLUG_CPU. But even though it is now done at
    the right layer, I don't see why PM should have to
    be bothered with selecting HOTPLUG_CPU either --
    it should just come with SMP.

    -Len
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-07-31 05:57    [W:4.123 / U:0.624 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site