lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 30 Jul 2007 21:10:29 +0200
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)

* Kenneth Prugh <ken69267@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > <large snip>
>
> Hello, I have a gaming rig and would love to help benchmark with my
> copy of UT2004(E6600 Core2 and a 7950GTO card). Or if you have
> anything else that would better serve as a benchmark I could grab it
> and try.
>
> The only problem is I don't know what 2 kernels I should be using to
> test the schedulers. I assume 2.6.23-rc1 for CFS, but what about SD?

.22-ck1 includes it, so that should be fine:

http://ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0707.1/0318.html

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-30 21:13    [from the cache]
©2003-2010