lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
Martin Schwidefsky wrote:

>
> Do we care ? The code should be replaced with ptep_get_and_clear +
> pte_modify anyway..
>

Since the general direction of this thread was for people to test 3D
game performance with the shiny new CFS cpu scheduler, I would say yes,
we do care if people with the only 2 types of gaming caliber Video cards
can get said video cards working, right now, with said shiny new kernel.

Yes yes, I know, kernel devs don't care if they break binary drivers...
and in principle, I agree with that philosophy.. but it's still damn
inconvenient at times :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-30 19:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans