![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 7/3/07, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > does it still get more CPU time than you'd expect it to get? A reniced > or SCHED_IDLE task will 'fill in' any idle time that it senses, so in > itself it's not an anomaly if a task gets 50% and FEH fills in the > remaining 50%. Does it still get CPU time if you start two CPU hogs: > > for (( N=0; N < 2; N++ )); do ( while :; do :; done ) & done > > ? If yes, that would be an anomaly. No, with this test, it gets the expected amount of CPU. Thanks for clearing it up! Vegard - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-07-03 11:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||