lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 3 Jul 2007 11:11:56 +0200
From"Vegard Nossum" <>
SubjectRe: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v18
On 7/3/07, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> does it still get more CPU time than you'd expect it to get? A reniced
> or SCHED_IDLE task will 'fill in' any idle time that it senses, so in
> itself it's not an anomaly if a task gets 50% and FEH fills in the
> remaining 50%. Does it still get CPU time if you start two CPU hogs:
>
>    for (( N=0; N < 2; N++ )); do ( while :; do :; done ) & done
>
> ? If yes, that would be an anomaly.

No, with this test, it gets the expected amount of CPU. Thanks for
clearing it up!

Vegard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-03 11:15    [from the cache]
©2003-2008