Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 3 Jul 2007 18:02:33 +0100 | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
| |
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 12:57:17PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 12:03:33PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > > Quite apart from the sync() matter, _any_ synchronous call to a FUSE > > > filesystem during STR will cause trouble. Even if the user task > > > implementing the filesystem isn't frozen, when it tries to carry out > > > some I/O to a suspended device it will either: > > > > > > block until the system wakes up, or > > > > For the suspend to RAM case, that sounds absolutely fine. > > It's not so good when your suspend process has to wait for the call to > complete!
Why would it have to? Sorry, I suspect I'm missing something obvious here.
-- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |