lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] sched: introduce SD_BALANCE_FORK for ht/mc/smp domains

* Siddha, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> wrote:

> They might be doing more exec's and probably covered by exec balance.
>
> There was a small pthread test case which was calculating the time to
> create all the threads and how much time each thread took to start
> running. It appeared as if the threads ran sequentially one after
> another on a DP system with four cores leading to this SD_BALANCE_FORK
> observation.

would be nice to dig out that testcase i suspect and quantify the
benefits of your patch. Another workload which might perform better
would be linpack: it benefits from fast and immediate 'spreading' of
freshly forked threads.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-29 23:23    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site