[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1
    On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
    >> Im still not so keen about this, Ingo never did get CFS to match SD in
    >> smoothness for 3d applications, where my test subjects are quake(s),
    >> world of warcraft via wine, unreal tournament 2004. And this is despite
    >> many patches he sent me to try and tweak it.
    > You realize that different people get different behaviour, don't you?
    > Maybe not.
    > People who think SD was "perfect" were simply ignoring reality. Sadly,
    > that seemed to include Con too, which was one of the main reasons that I
    > never ended entertaining the notion of merging SD for very long at all:
    > Con ended up arguing against people who reported problems, rather than
    > trying to work with them.

    I don't really want to keep all that -ck flamewar going but this sum-up is
    a little strange for me:

    If Con was thinking SD was "perfect" why he released 30+ versions of it?
    And who knows how many versions of his previous scheduler?

    Besides Con always tried to help people and improve his code if some bugs
    or problems were reported. Archives of this list prove that. I reported
    several problems (on list and privately) and all were fixed very fast and
    with very kind responses. I had run -ck for months and years and it was
    always very stable (I remember one broken "stable" version).

    I don't know what exactly are you refering to when you say about those
    unaddressed reports but maybe it depends on who was asking, how and to do
    what (for example - purely theoretical one, I don't remember exact emails
    you refering to so I am not saying it happened - stating at the beginning
    that the whole design is unacceptable and interactivity hacks are a
    must-have won't make a friend from any maintainer and for sure lowers his
    desire to get anything fixed for that guy). Or maybe Con had some bad day
    or was depressed. Happens. But I really don't remember Con ignoring too
    many valuable user reports in last 3 years...

    And no - I am not thinking that SD was "perfect". Nothing is perfect,
    especially not software. But it was based on months and years of Con's
    experience with desktop and gaming workloads and extensively tested in
    similar uses by _many_ others. In nearly all possible desktop
    configurations, with most games and all video drivers. This is why it was
    perfectly designed and tuned for such workloads while still being general
    enough and without any ugly hacks. And because of these tests and Con's
    believe that the desktop is very (most?) important all bugs and problems
    in this area were probably killed long ago. I think even design was
    changed and tuned a little at the early stages to help solve such
    interactivity/dekstop/gaming problems.

    So it does not surprise me that CFS is worse in such workloads (at least
    for some people) because I strongly suspect that the number of people who
    played games with current version of CFS is limited to about 5, maybe 10.
    And I also suspect that you (and Ingo) will get many regression reports
    when 2.6.23 is released (and months later too... or maybe you won't
    because users will be to "scared" to report such hard to mensure and
    reproduce "unimportant" bugs). Hopefully such problems when reported will
    be addressed as soon as they can. And hopefully they will be easy enough
    to solve without rewriting or redesigning CFS and causing that way even
    more regressions in other areas. If not people will probably be patching
    O(1) scheduler back privately...


    Grzegorz Kulewski

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-07-28 09:11    [W:0.022 / U:48.188 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site